|
CASE HISTORY:
Systems Design & Integration: Longmont,
Colorado - www.TeamWSA.com |
Pull-Flow Established At Mackie Design | ||
|
Mackie Design implements a Pull-Flow Production Systems to get "lean" by reducing cycle time and WIP inventory waste. Workplace Sciences utilizes a Pull-Flow University approach to provide Mackie employees with classroom training along with hands-on installation and support of their first pull-flow assembly cell. Mackie
strives for high value and high quality performance in all of its
operational areas as well. However it found that one key part of the
manufacturing operations, the product assembly lines, were in need of
process reengineering. The Woodinville, Washington-based company had been producing products from an outdated production philosophy that grouped its manufacturing resources by functional departments. All circuit board assembly "stuffing" occurred in one area. Post wave solder assembly in another. Testing yet in another distant area. Orders had to be batched and manually moved from area to area — an approach not very well suited to a fast-growing production facility with medium to complex products. Cycle times were long and work-in-progress inventories were high. Process quality feedback took days to reach the workstation responsible for the defect. A new "Mackoid" executive vice president, Wyatt Hyora, moved quickly to address the situation. He knew that he wanted an pull-flow production system that could keep up with future order volume while cutting significantly the "on the floor" WIP inventory and cycle time. He wanted a production system that was cellular with all the resources available within the cell to build the product from start to finish. But most of all, he wanted a manufacturing operation that responded to customer demands in a fast and accurate manner without the need to build excess finished good inventory. Mackie Design was on the road to achieve these objectives with the completion in December of 2000 of a new Pull-Flow Production assembly cell at their Woodinville plant.
No significant capital investments were required to "re-engineer" the production flow. The installation and operation went very well and right-on schedule. Jeff Smith, the Mackie team leader, lead the cross-functional team to a successful implementation. | ||
|
"Participative Turn-Key" Approach | ||
|
Design and installation of the
new Pull-Flow production cell was a team effort between Mackie Designs and
Workplace Sciences of Longmont, Colorado. Workplace Sciences
is a
systems designer and integrator of "best-in-class" manufacturing
and distribution systems.
To meet the critical objective of a long term sustainable
production system, Workplace Sciences utilized their "Participative Turn-Key"
approach to the Pull-Flow system development. Workplace Sciences believes that in
order for a new production philosophy to take root within the organization
those departments affected by the change must participate in the
development and installation of the production system. Resistance to
change is minimized by this approach. It was decided to implement a
Pull-Flow pilot line where the various departments would participate in
the design process. A cross-functional team was started and a Mackie team
leader appointed.
The "Pull-Flow University" Workplace Sciences, the
"change agent" and
"facilitator" of the project, had to maintain a fine balance between
the contributions provided by the Mackie team members and the
consultant in the design of the system.
Workplace Sciences made the workforce development the primary priority. For
Workplace Sciences all
projects are about organizational transformation and change
management. Workplace Sciences attests that organizational learning followed by
timely application has been the best approach to all its successful
projects. Prior to starting the design of the new Pull-Flow
assembly cell Workplace Sciences conducted a series of workshops that would provide the
foundation for the team members. The first workshop was an
"experiential" course that immersed the learners in a simulated
factory. The first part of the "hands-on" workshop ran a
factory with their old batch - push flow production system.
Performance was recorded. The second part of the workshop ran the
simulated factory in a Pull-Flow production manner. Performances of
both systems were then compared demonstrating the "see for
yourself" advantages of the new Pull-Flow production system.
Other workshops were provided that discussed the designing and sustaining
details for a Pull-Flow production system. | ||
Advantages of the Pull-Flow Production System tm | ||
|
After
the initial pilot Pull-Flow assembly cell was completed Mackie employees
at Woodinville are implementing five new Pull-Flow assembly cells. The teamwork and the project approach has paid
off. Mackie continues fulfilling orders at peak performance
level that its customers have come to expect from the products themselves. | ||
|
The Pull-Flow Production System at Mackie | ||
|
Circuit boards arriving from the
Surface Mount Technology line are pulled one at at time into the "hand stuff" | ||
|
Before Push vs. Pull Production System After |
||
|
Facts and Figures | ||
|
Company: Mackie Design, Inc Production System Design, Integration & Project Management: Workplace Sciences, LLC Pull-Flow and Pull-Flow Production System are trademarks of Workplace Sciences, LLC |